Gabriel Weinstein

The future of leadership is not about heroes, but about gardeners

Why does the system reward toxic leaders and fail to distribute power? True leadership is not about charisma, but about coherence.

Written by
Gabriel Weinstein

Partner, board member and director of Olivia's expansion in Europe. Co-author of Crisis & Co., he has been recognized as one of the 35 most inspiring and creative Argentines.

This is the second article in a series of three on data fallacies—the most common mistakes in interpreting data that, far from helping us, can lead us to wrong decisions.

In the first one, we discussed the trap of summarized metrics—you can read it here; today we explore an even more dangerous one because it disguises itself as perfection: overfitting.

When data “learn by heart”

Imagine someone studying for an exam by memorizing all the questions from previous years. On test day, they might get a perfect score—but if the questions change, they won’t know how to respond. The same thing happens with data models that fall into overfitting: they look flawless because they fit the past with absolute precision, but they fail when faced with new situations.

In other words, data learn by heart, not the lesson.

Everyday examples


Weather prediction: A model that fits a single month in great detail may seem accurate. But the following month, patterns change and the prediction loses all validity.
The overly confident GPS: A GPS that memorizes every pothole and traffic light on your daily route will be perfect… only on that route. If you travel to another city, it becomes useless.

In People Analytics
In the world of people management, overfitting appears more often than we think:

  • A model that perfectly explains the results of a survey… but only for a specific period or area. When applied in another context, it fails.

  • A turnover indicator so specific that it only reflects particular cases and does not help anticipate real trends.

  • Performance predictions with too many irrelevant variables, resulting in fragile models that are impossible to replicate.

The problem is that apparent precision misleads us: we believe we have the “perfect model,” when in reality we have built a house of cards.

Final reflection

Overfitting reminds us that the past does not guarantee the future. In People Analytics—and in any data-driven discipline—we are not looking for explanations that fit perfectly with what already happened, but for robust models that allow us to anticipate what is coming.

Sometimes, perfection in data is not an achievement, but a trap.

By Yoel Kluk, Partner at Olivia Mexico.

 

Other reflections from Gabriel Weinstein

Leading in January: size doesn’t matter

January is the month when everyone talks about change. New strategies, new org charts, new narratives. But there is something that is rarely examined ...
Read more

Not everything changes: the human element remains our most powerful advantage

For decades, we have heard—almost as a mantra of our time—that the only constant is change.
Read more

When a leader clashes with the company culture

Organizational culture—the intricate web of values, behaviors, and internal dynamics—is not always visible in financial reports, but it plays a key ro...
Read more