Yoel Kluk, partner at Olivia Mexico

Why Asking About Psychological Safety Doesn't Measure It

HR has been measuring culture backwards for forty years. Why asking about psychological safety doesn't measure it, and what to audit instead.

Written by
Irene Marques
Irene Marques

Partner at Olivia México. Specialist in facilitation and design of innovation workshops, alignment, prioritization, prototyping and strategic implementation as drivers of transformation.

Open ten organizational culture surveys and you'll find the same phrase in all of them: psychological safety. And I don't know a single company that can prove it has it.

What they do have is the good intention declared as a corporate value, repeated during onboarding, and measured with a question like "I feel safe expressing my opinion on my team." That doesn't measure psychological safety. It measures whether that person, on that day, decided to answer yes.

The Answer Is Already Shaped by the System

And that answer doesn't depend on their attitude. It depends on whether they've ever seen someone pay a real price for speaking up. On who holds the power to retaliate. On what happened to the last person who made a mistake in public.

Asking people whether they have psychological safety is like asking the thermometer if it's hot outside: the answer is already shaped by the system you're trying to measure, not by the person.

Schein Made This Clear Forty Years Ago

This isn't a new discovery. Edgar Schein made it clear almost forty years ago: culture operates in layers, and at the top there are only visible behaviors. Below, where nobody measures, are the assumptions that actually decide what can and can't be done.

HR has had that theory available since the eighties. What it did over four decades wasn't update the model. It updated the survey: it added engagement in the 2000s, agility in the 2010s, wellbeing after the pandemic. It's still the same top layer, with more rows added.

It's Not an Attribute of People — It's an Effect of Design

Psychological safety isn't something people have or don't have. It's the effect of organizational design decisions that almost never get audited: who holds power, what happens when someone makes a mistake, whether the reporting channel is real or just a form nobody reads.

As long as we keep asking people how they feel instead of auditing what in the system makes that feeling possible, we'll keep updating the survey every five years and calling it cultural transformation.


Learn how we work with culture as a system, not as a declaration. Discover our approach to cultural transformation.

By Yoel Kluk, Partner at Olivia Mexico.

CHANGE MANAGEMENT PEOPLE ANALYTICS
Other reflections from Irene Marques

The Skills That Will Decide Who Leads Transformation Over the Next Five Years

Not long ago I read a phrase in a Financial Times article that I couldn't get out of my head: "those who are a step behind in understanding the disrup...
Read more

The Problem Isn't the Technology. It's What Happens to People When It Arrives.

A few years ago, a specialist we worked with asked a question that has stayed with me: why are people so afraid to put a face to data?
Read more

Myths and Truths About Innovation in Business

We confuse creativity with innovation, we think that innovating means having lots of ideas, and we believe we're not creative. These misunderstandings...
Read more